Get Causality is designed for desktop — open on a larger screen for the full modeling experience.

Decisions fail when you misread
how stakeholders connect ideas.

Get Causality is a survey platform for collecting people's cause-and-effect reasoning. Two people can give the same answer for different reasons, and a plan built for one reason can fail with the other. Each respondent rates how strongly your concepts affect one another, building their own causal map, and you compare those maps by group or combine them into one.

Nodes: 0 | Edges: 0
1 → thousands
From one map to all your respondents
Group + population
Compare groups, then combine them
Analyses run on your machine
Analyses run in your browser, so running more of them never costs more
.docx · .pdf · .xlsx · .csv
Publication-ready export

Why Get Causality

See the reasoning behind people's answers: how they believe things affect one another, and where groups part ways.

01

Turn views into models

Each respondent's ratings become a causal map: concepts, directed links, and a weight on each link.

02

Work at survey scale

Thousands of individual maps combine into one group map per segment. You see which links most people share and which split the sample.

03

Explore an intervention

Push one concept up or down and see what people's stated beliefs imply for the rest of the map. Goal-Seek starts from the outcome you want and searches for the changes that, under respondents' stated beliefs, would reach it.

04

See where groups split

Split by role, region, organization or any other column, then test whether the groups' maps differ beyond chance.

Workflow

A study runs in four stages, from choosing concepts to reporting results. You can run it yourself, or start with a facilitated workshop to choose the concepts.

Stage previews are illustrative.

01

Concept Design

Optional · Facilitated

Pick the concepts respondents will rate, or start from concepts chosen in a facilitated workshop.

02

Survey & Collection

A survey builder made for causal questions, with skip logic and version history. Distribute by link, QR code, email or embed widget, or send SMS through your own webhook. Each person rates only part of the grid of links, so a long concept list stays quick to answer.

03

Compare Groups

Multi-Model tab

Put everyone's maps side by side, split by any group you choose. You see which links nearly everyone draws, which only one group draws, and whether groups' ratings differ more than chance, among respondents shown each link. Includes map comparison (QAP), cross-tabs, bootstrap intervals, clustering and motif counts.

04

Combined Map

Meta-Model tab

Combine everyone's maps into one shared belief map and ask it questions. Which concepts have the most influence once indirect paths count? What do people's beliefs imply if one factor is pushed up or down? How certain is each link? How often do people pick each concept? Includes total influence (direct + indirect) in the combined belief map, Bayesian uncertainty, discrete choice and what-if scenarios on the belief map.

Workflow stage

—

—

Try it · Illustrative simulator

Intervention Optimizer + Survey-Scale Translator.

Illustrative example: drag the levers and the predicted impacts recalculate instantly from a fixed set of example coefficients, translated back to the original 7-point Likert scale so policy shifts stay readable to non-technical stakeholders.

+0.50
−1 Suppress0+1 Activate
+0.50
−1 Suppress0+1 Activate
+0.50
−1 Suppress0+1 Activate

Predicted system impact · translated to original 7-pt Likert response

CO₂ Emissions Reduction
+0.55
Economic Resilience
+0.10
Energy Security
+0.45
Public Support
+0.55
Example preset

Illustrative combination, not a computed recommendation: Carbon Pricing 0.7, Renewable Subsidies 0.8, Public Awareness 0.6. Applying it moves the sliders above and recalculates the predicted impact from the same fixed example coefficients.

Use cases

Six examples of how different fields might use the platform, each built on synthetic sample data. Open one to see its study design and an example chart.

Environmental Research

How do ecologists, foresters, land managers and residents explain forest health? Which restoration ideas do all four share, and which divide them?

Sample
n = 2,500 · 22 challenges · 16 interventions
Groups
4 stakeholder roles · 4 ecoregions (Cascades, Sierra, Coast Range, Klamath)
Example chart
Centrality comparison: one bar per role for each of 8 forest-health concepts

Public Health

Patients, clinicians and policymakers each rated what drives preventive-care uptake. The question is where their causal chains part.

Sample
n = 1,500 (817 patients · 450 clinicians · 233 policymakers) · 20 challenges · 15 interventions
Groups
3 stakeholder roles · 4 census regions · 4 organization types
Example chart
Cross-tab heatmap: top 10 causal links by role

Policy & Governance

A housing-affordability study across a metro area. Residents, developers and city staff each map the problem, so a policy team can see which pathways overlap before drafting anything.

Sample
n = 2,000 · 18 challenges · 14 interventions
Groups
3 stakeholder roles · 4 area types · 4 organizations
Example chart
Motif analysis: share of each structural pattern per role

Business & Strategy

Two firms, one go-to-market question, three levels of the org chart. Do individual contributors, middle managers and the C-suite agree on what moves the numbers?

Sample
n = 750 · 14 challenges · 12 interventions
Groups
3 org levels (IC · middle manager · C-suite) · 5 functions · 2 firms
Example chart
95% bootstrap interval for each link's mean weight: 5 strategy concepts × 3 org levels

Fisheries & Marine

An Atlantic coastal fishery. Commercial fishers, charter operators, coastal residents and fishery managers rate the same stressors and management actions.

Sample
n = 2,000 · 10 stressors · 8 management actions
Groups
4 roles (commercial fisher, charter operator, coastal resident, fishery manager) · 4 regions (Gulf of Maine to South Atlantic) · 3 port sizes
Example chart
Edge frequency by role

Academic Research

What drives research productivity? Graduate students, postdocs, PIs and staff scientists at four R1 institutions each rank their top three challenges, then rate the links between them.

Sample
n = 2,500 · 18 challenges · 14 interventions
Groups
4 disciplines (biomedical, engineering, physical sciences, social sciences) · 4 career stages · 4 R1 institutions
Example chart
Top-3 challenge ranking by career stage
Use case

—

—

Example chart —

Pricing

There are eight plans. Contact us for current prices. If you join during the closed beta, you keep a founding rate for two years after public launch.

EDU LICENSE

Free

Available at public launch

Learn causal modeling, run a pilot

  • Model Builder (up to 25 concepts)
  • Basic single-model analysis
  • 1 survey, 100 responses
  • CSV / PNG export
  • Community support
Talk to us →
EDU LICENSE

Academic

Institutional rates available

Academic eligibility confirmed on request

  • All Multi-Model analyses
  • QAP · Cluster · Motif · Edge Frequency
  • Goal-Seek Optimizer (3 modes)
  • 10 surveys · unlimited responses
  • All export formats
  • Email support · 48h
  • Combined-map analyses
  • Predictive Cognition
  • LLM FCM Builder
Talk to us →
EDU LICENSE

Academic Plus

Multi-site & consortium pricing

Group comparisons and population models

  • Everything in Academic, plus:
  • Population model analyses
  • Total influence (direct + indirect) · Bayesian · Discrete Choice
  • Temporal analysis
  • Goal-Seek Ensemble
  • 25 surveys · unlimited responses
  • Predictive Cognition
  • LLM FCM Builder
Talk to us →
EDU LICENSE

Academic Pro

Full platform · edu pricing

Adds Predictive Cognition and the AI model builder

  • Predictive Cognition
  • GAN (SN-GAN) synthetic data
  • Demographic-conditioned synthetic maps (SN-GAN), run in the browser via Pyodide; for method testing, not inference
  • LLM FCM Builder (browser-local)
  • Everything in Academic Plus
  • Every analysis on the platform
  • Priority support · 24h
Talk to us →
COMMERCIAL

Researcher

Solo & small-team rates

Consultancies, small teams

  • Commercial license included
  • All Multi-Model analyses
  • Goal-Seek Optimizer (3 modes)
  • LLM FCM Builder (browser-local)
  • 10 surveys · unlimited responses
  • Priority support · 24h
  • Combined-map analyses
  • Predictive Cognition
Talk to us →
COMMERCIAL

Team

Volume & multi-seat pricing

Research teams & organizations

  • Everything in Professional
  • 10 team members included
  • Custom branding
  • Priority support · 12h
Talk to us →
ENTERPRISE

Enterprise

Custom contract · SLA included

Tailored for large institutions

  • Everything in Team
  • Unlimited team members
  • SSO & SAML 2.0 / OIDC
  • Custom integrations and development
  • Enterprise SLA
  • Training & onboarding
Talk to us →

FAQ

What is Get Causality?

We record each person's stated cause-and-effect beliefs about the concepts you choose. Surveys tell you people's opinions. We show you how they're thinking about the problem. Do they see it as one thing causing another in a line? Or do they see a complex web of interconnected causes? Get Causality collects these maps through a survey, so you can gather them from thousands of people and compare them.

What is a mental model?

A mental model is how someone internalizes cause-and-effect relationships in their head. It's their personal theory of how things work. For example, one person might think "more regulation → less pollution → better health." Another might think "more regulation → higher costs → job losses → worse health." Same topic, completely different mental models. Understanding these differences is key to effective communication and policy design.

What does it actually measure?

Three things. (1) What concepts people connect: do they link "climate change" to "fishing" or not? (2) How they connect them: does A cause B, or do they affect each other? (3) How their map is shaped: simple chains or feedback loops. The output is a map of their thinking, plus statistics showing whether different groups think differently.

How does the platform work?

(1) Join the waitlist. Get Causality is in closed beta, no billing yet. (2) Create a survey with our drag-and-drop builder, or import existing data. (3) Share a link and participants rate how strongly each concept affects the others in their browser (no app install). (4) Platform aggregates responses into analyzable networks automatically. (5) Run analyses with one click: centrality, clustering, group comparisons. (6) Export publication-ready visualizations and statistics.

Who is this for?

Anyone who needs to understand stakeholders before making big decisions: consultants doing stakeholder analysis for clients, companies launching new products or policies, governments designing public policy, and researchers studying how people understand complex issues.

How is this different from a regular survey tool?

It is a full survey tool: build, distribute, and collect standard surveys, and analyze the results (descriptive stats, reliability, correlations, group comparisons, cross-tabs) right in your browser. The difference is what else it captures: surveys ask the questions you think matter; we also let people tell us what they think matters and how it all connects. Example: a survey asks "Do you support climate policy?" and gets 60% saying yes. We show which causes each person links to that answer, so you can see groups that agree for different reasons. Same opinion, completely different thinking. You need the why to design messages that work.

How long does analysis actually take?

Most of the time in a causal-mapping study goes to cleaning responses, reshaping matrices and writing scripts before any test runs. Get Causality does that step for you: import or collect the data, choose your analyses, and the platform builds the group maps and runs the comparisons. Run time depends on sample size and which analyses you choose.

What's included in the free plan?

At public launch the Free plan will include the model builder (up to 25 concepts), 1 survey, basic single-model analysis, and CSV/PNG export, built for students, small pilot projects, or evaluating the platform. We're in closed beta right now; join the waitlist for early access and a founding rate.

Does it estimate causal effects?

No. Outputs are stated beliefs. The platform does not estimate causal effects from data or forecast outcomes.

What data formats can I import?

You can import .json, .csv and .xlsx files: survey exports, model JSON files and Excel adjacency matrices. The platform reads the format from the file extension and converts it, so you do not need to reshape the file by hand.

What kind of analyses can I run?

Two kinds. Comparison analyses set individual and group maps against each other: where people agree, which links are shared or contested, and whether groups' ratings differ more than chance, among respondents shown each link. Population analyses work on the combined map: which concepts have the most total influence (direct + indirect) in the combined belief map, what people's beliefs imply if a factor is pushed up or down, how certain each link is, and how often people pick each concept. Each result comes with a chart, a plain-language guide and a Word/PDF report.

Is my research data secure?

Yes. Data is encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+) and at rest, and direct identifiers such as email addresses, names and IP addresses are additionally encrypted with AES-256-GCM before storage. Passwords are hashed with bcrypt. A built-in PII filter strips personally identifiable columns from data you import before it reaches any analysis. Two-factor authentication via TOTP or email codes. IP allowlists for sign-in. Researchers can export or delete their account data themselves, and survey participants can access, correct, restrict or erase their responses through our Data Rights Portal; our GDPR compliance program is still in progress, and our Privacy Policy describes what is in place today. Custom data-handling agreements available for IRBs with specific requirements.

What enterprise security features do you offer?

Institutional SSO (SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect) and the per-institution 2FA policy that rides on it are Enterprise only. WebAuthn/FIDO2 passwordless login, trusted-device management, audit logging and intrusion-detection alerting are not tier-gated at all: they are on every plan, including Free. All security events logged with user ID, IP, and timestamp for IRB and compliance review.

How does billing work?

At public launch you will be able to pay monthly or annually. All plans include feature updates as we add them. Contact us for current pricing, including enterprise and multi-seat options.

Can I try it before committing?

Yes. Explore the live demo above with example models — no account needed. When you're ready, join the beta waitlist for early access and lock in a founding rate for two years after public launch.

Can I cite Get Causality in publications?

Yes. We appreciate (but do not require) a citation. Suggested APA: Prasky, E. (2026). Get Causality: Browser-based causal mapping research platform [Software]. https://Get-Causality.com. BibTeX and in-text formats in the Terms of Service.

Where does computation happen?

Analyses run in your browser: the platform uses Web Workers and in-browser WebAssembly (Pyodide), with WebLLM/WebGPU for language-model features, to run the analyses client-side, so analysis results are computed on your machine. Survey responses themselves are stored on our servers, and each respondent's individual cognitive map is built there when they submit.

Can I collaborate with co-investigators?

Yes. Professional and Team plans include shared team access with role-based permissions. Team members can view surveys, run analyses, and export results from a shared workspace. Enterprise plans offer unlimited team members with SSO integration.

What if I have more questions?

Just reach out. For general questions, email [email protected]. To schedule a demo for your team, contact [email protected]. Support response times vary by plan: 48 hours on Academic, 24 hours on Academic Plus, Academic Pro, Researcher and Professional, 12 hours on Team, and a dedicated contact on Enterprise. Free accounts use the community channel. Beta users get priority support and direct access to our development team.

Get access

We're in closed beta and not charging yet. Join the waitlist to keep the founding rate for two years after public launch.

We use these details to handle your request and to email you about beta access and your founding rate. See our Privacy Policy (opens in new tab) for how we handle your information.