Turn views into models
Each respondent's ratings become a causal map: concepts, directed links, and a weight on each link.
Get Causality is a survey platform for collecting people's cause-and-effect reasoning. Two people can give the same answer for different reasons, and a plan built for one reason can fail with the other. Each respondent rates how strongly your concepts affect one another, building their own causal map, and you compare those maps by group or combine them into one.
See the reasoning behind people's answers: how they believe things affect one another, and where groups part ways.
Each respondent's ratings become a causal map: concepts, directed links, and a weight on each link.
Thousands of individual maps combine into one group map per segment. You see which links most people share and which split the sample.
Push one concept up or down and see what people's stated beliefs imply for the rest of the map. Goal-Seek starts from the outcome you want and searches for the changes that, under respondents' stated beliefs, would reach it.
Split by role, region, organization or any other column, then test whether the groups' maps differ beyond chance.
A study runs in four stages, from choosing concepts to reporting results. You can run it yourself, or start with a facilitated workshop to choose the concepts.
Stage previews are illustrative.
Optional · Facilitated
Pick the concepts respondents will rate, or start from concepts chosen in a facilitated workshop.
A survey builder made for causal questions, with skip logic and version history. Distribute by link, QR code, email or embed widget, or send SMS through your own webhook. Each person rates only part of the grid of links, so a long concept list stays quick to answer.
Multi-Model tab
Put everyone's maps side by side, split by any group you choose. You see which links nearly everyone draws, which only one group draws, and whether groups' ratings differ more than chance, among respondents shown each link. Includes map comparison (QAP), cross-tabs, bootstrap intervals, clustering and motif counts.
Meta-Model tab
Combine everyone's maps into one shared belief map and ask it questions. Which concepts have the most influence once indirect paths count? What do people's beliefs imply if one factor is pushed up or down? How certain is each link? How often do people pick each concept? Includes total influence (direct + indirect) in the combined belief map, Bayesian uncertainty, discrete choice and what-if scenarios on the belief map.
Illustrative example: drag the levers and the predicted impacts recalculate instantly from a fixed set of example coefficients, translated back to the original 7-point Likert scale so policy shifts stay readable to non-technical stakeholders.
Illustrative combination, not a computed recommendation: Carbon Pricing 0.7, Renewable Subsidies 0.8, Public Awareness 0.6. Applying it moves the sliders above and recalculates the predicted impact from the same fixed example coefficients.
Six examples of how different fields might use the platform, each built on synthetic sample data. Open one to see its study design and an example chart.
How do ecologists, foresters, land managers and residents explain forest health? Which restoration ideas do all four share, and which divide them?
Patients, clinicians and policymakers each rated what drives preventive-care uptake. The question is where their causal chains part.
A housing-affordability study across a metro area. Residents, developers and city staff each map the problem, so a policy team can see which pathways overlap before drafting anything.
Two firms, one go-to-market question, three levels of the org chart. Do individual contributors, middle managers and the C-suite agree on what moves the numbers?
An Atlantic coastal fishery. Commercial fishers, charter operators, coastal residents and fishery managers rate the same stressors and management actions.
What drives research productivity? Graduate students, postdocs, PIs and staff scientists at four R1 institutions each rank their top three challenges, then rate the links between them.
There are eight plans. Contact us for current prices. If you join during the closed beta, you keep a founding rate for two years after public launch.
Available at public launch
Learn causal modeling, run a pilot
Institutional rates available
Academic eligibility confirmed on request
Multi-site & consortium pricing
Group comparisons and population models
Full platform · edu pricing
Adds Predictive Cognition and the AI model builder
Solo & small-team rates
Consultancies, small teams
Commercial rates available
Full platform + commercial license
Volume & multi-seat pricing
Research teams & organizations
Custom contract · SLA included
Tailored for large institutions
All plans include basic analysis, unlimited responses per survey (100 on Free), and CSV/PNG export.
| Academic (Edu License) | Commercial | Enterprise | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature | Free | Academic | Acad Plus | Acad Pro | Researcher | Professional | Team | Enterprise |
| Multi-Model Analyses | — | |||||||
| Meta-Model Analyses | — | — | — | |||||
| Predictive Cognition | — | — | — | — | ||||
| LLM FCM Builder | — | — | — | |||||
| Goal-Seek Optimizer | — | 3 modes | All modes | All modes | 3 modes | All modes | All modes | All modes |
| Stored Surveys | 1 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 100 | Unlimited |
| A/B Testing & Custom Branding | — | — | — | — | — | |||
| Team Members | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | Unlimited |
| SSO / SAML | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Support | Community | Email 48h | Email 24h | Priority 24h | Priority 24h | Email 24h | Priority 12h | Dedicated |
We record each person's stated cause-and-effect beliefs about the concepts you choose. Surveys tell you people's opinions. We show you how they're thinking about the problem. Do they see it as one thing causing another in a line? Or do they see a complex web of interconnected causes? Get Causality collects these maps through a survey, so you can gather them from thousands of people and compare them.
A mental model is how someone internalizes cause-and-effect relationships in their head. It's their personal theory of how things work. For example, one person might think "more regulation → less pollution → better health." Another might think "more regulation → higher costs → job losses → worse health." Same topic, completely different mental models. Understanding these differences is key to effective communication and policy design.
Three things. (1) What concepts people connect: do they link "climate change" to "fishing" or not? (2) How they connect them: does A cause B, or do they affect each other? (3) How their map is shaped: simple chains or feedback loops. The output is a map of their thinking, plus statistics showing whether different groups think differently.
(1) Join the waitlist. Get Causality is in closed beta, no billing yet. (2) Create a survey with our drag-and-drop builder, or import existing data. (3) Share a link and participants rate how strongly each concept affects the others in their browser (no app install). (4) Platform aggregates responses into analyzable networks automatically. (5) Run analyses with one click: centrality, clustering, group comparisons. (6) Export publication-ready visualizations and statistics.
Anyone who needs to understand stakeholders before making big decisions: consultants doing stakeholder analysis for clients, companies launching new products or policies, governments designing public policy, and researchers studying how people understand complex issues.
It is a full survey tool: build, distribute, and collect standard surveys, and analyze the results (descriptive stats, reliability, correlations, group comparisons, cross-tabs) right in your browser. The difference is what else it captures: surveys ask the questions you think matter; we also let people tell us what they think matters and how it all connects. Example: a survey asks "Do you support climate policy?" and gets 60% saying yes. We show which causes each person links to that answer, so you can see groups that agree for different reasons. Same opinion, completely different thinking. You need the why to design messages that work.
Most of the time in a causal-mapping study goes to cleaning responses, reshaping matrices and writing scripts before any test runs. Get Causality does that step for you: import or collect the data, choose your analyses, and the platform builds the group maps and runs the comparisons. Run time depends on sample size and which analyses you choose.
At public launch the Free plan will include the model builder (up to 25 concepts), 1 survey, basic single-model analysis, and CSV/PNG export, built for students, small pilot projects, or evaluating the platform. We're in closed beta right now; join the waitlist for early access and a founding rate.
No. Outputs are stated beliefs. The platform does not estimate causal effects from data or forecast outcomes.
You can import .json, .csv and .xlsx files: survey exports, model JSON files and Excel adjacency matrices. The platform reads the format from the file extension and converts it, so you do not need to reshape the file by hand.
Two kinds. Comparison analyses set individual and group maps against each other: where people agree, which links are shared or contested, and whether groups' ratings differ more than chance, among respondents shown each link. Population analyses work on the combined map: which concepts have the most total influence (direct + indirect) in the combined belief map, what people's beliefs imply if a factor is pushed up or down, how certain each link is, and how often people pick each concept. Each result comes with a chart, a plain-language guide and a Word/PDF report.
Yes. Data is encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+) and at rest, and direct identifiers such as email addresses, names and IP addresses are additionally encrypted with AES-256-GCM before storage. Passwords are hashed with bcrypt. A built-in PII filter strips personally identifiable columns from data you import before it reaches any analysis. Two-factor authentication via TOTP or email codes. IP allowlists for sign-in. Researchers can export or delete their account data themselves, and survey participants can access, correct, restrict or erase their responses through our Data Rights Portal; our GDPR compliance program is still in progress, and our Privacy Policy describes what is in place today. Custom data-handling agreements available for IRBs with specific requirements.
Institutional SSO (SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect) and the per-institution 2FA policy that rides on it are Enterprise only. WebAuthn/FIDO2 passwordless login, trusted-device management, audit logging and intrusion-detection alerting are not tier-gated at all: they are on every plan, including Free. All security events logged with user ID, IP, and timestamp for IRB and compliance review.
At public launch you will be able to pay monthly or annually. All plans include feature updates as we add them. Contact us for current pricing, including enterprise and multi-seat options.
Yes. Explore the live demo above with example models — no account needed. When you're ready, join the beta waitlist for early access and lock in a founding rate for two years after public launch.
Yes. We appreciate (but do not require) a citation. Suggested APA: Prasky, E. (2026). Get Causality: Browser-based causal mapping research platform [Software]. https://Get-Causality.com. BibTeX and in-text formats in the Terms of Service.
Analyses run in your browser: the platform uses Web Workers and in-browser WebAssembly (Pyodide), with WebLLM/WebGPU for language-model features, to run the analyses client-side, so analysis results are computed on your machine. Survey responses themselves are stored on our servers, and each respondent's individual cognitive map is built there when they submit.
Yes. Professional and Team plans include shared team access with role-based permissions. Team members can view surveys, run analyses, and export results from a shared workspace. Enterprise plans offer unlimited team members with SSO integration.
Just reach out. For general questions, email [email protected]. To schedule a demo for your team, contact [email protected]. Support response times vary by plan: 48 hours on Academic, 24 hours on Academic Plus, Academic Pro, Researcher and Professional, 12 hours on Team, and a dedicated contact on Enterprise. Free accounts use the community channel. Beta users get priority support and direct access to our development team.
We're in closed beta and not charging yet. Join the waitlist to keep the founding rate for two years after public launch.
You're # in line. We'll email you when your beta access is ready.